www.FairfaxCountyPrivacyCouncil.org


========================================
FCPC ALERT #2007-7:  Jeannemarie Devolites Davis – the anti-privacy candidate for the Virginia State Senate

Originally Published on Oct. 28, 2007
========================================

This message is intended for members of the Fairfax County Privacy Council, and anyone else who might be interested in advancing privacy in Virginia. Maximum dissemination of this message is encouraged!

Privacy Notice: All communication from the Fairfax Privacy Council is sent using blind carbon copy ("BCC") format for your security and privacy.

ALERT ITEM SUMMARY:
1.  Jeannemarie Devolites Davis attacks opponent by sending mailer listing opponent’s family’s personal information to thousands of strangers

2.  Jeannemarie Devolites Davis, blocking social security number privacy reform since 2002

3.  Bright spot of the week – Fairfax County Board of Supervisor Chairman candidate Gary Baise says “no” to red light cameras

4.  FCPC activist wins lawsuit against Norfolk Airport Authority over illegal sign at airport stating vehicles subject to search – who’s watching the airport board?


***************************
1.  Jeannemarie Devolites Davis attacks opponent by sending mailer listing opponent’s family’s personal information to thousands of strangers

***************************
In recent days Jeannemarie Devolites Davis has shown her true colors on privacy by sending thousands of mailers to strangers across Fairfax County attacking her opponent Chap Petersen, a former Delegate of Fairfax County.  The mailer reportedly insinuated that Mr. Petersen was responsible for the failure of the Enron corporation, and circled the heads of Petersen’s daughters with red ink while prominently listing the daughters’ names, home address, and home telephone number.  Crank phone calls subsequently caused Mrs. Petersen and children to move out of their home police patrolled their neighborhood.

 

“The Fairfax County Commonwealth's Attorney is looking into whether a recent campaign flyer from state Sen. Jeanemarie Devolites Davis (R-Fairfax) went too far” but a defiant Devolites Davis justified the attack mailer by saying that by allowing his family to be a part of his campaign, “Petersen put his family in play.”  Virginia State Senate Race Heats Up, Oct. 26, 2007, at http://www.wjla.com/news/stories/1007/467330.html; see also related WJLA video at http://www.wjla.com/news/stories/1007/467330_video.html?ref=newsstory.

 

"The thing that really bothers me is it was part of an attack ad," Petersen said. "This ad is meant to incite anger at me, and then you have my daughters' names circled and my home phone number circled and my home address circled. The net effect is to get somebody angry at me and have them contact me."  . . . [A]cting commonwealth's attorney Ray Morrogh, . . . said the mail crosses a line.  "We need to keep it clean. Even the mafia doesn't touch the families.”  Va. State Senate Race Turns Tense, Oct. 26, 2007, at http://www.nbc4.com/news/14434768/detail.html.  See also related NBC4 video at http://www.nbc4.com/news/14434768/detail.html.

 

Devolites Davis’ effort to label Petersen as responsible for the Enron disaster is about as childish as Al Gore claiming to have invented the Internet.  But Devolites Davis role in personally approved this inflammatory mailer and also to draw red circles around little children’s’ heads and list their names, address, and phone number strikes many as just plain sick, like something you might see on one of the edgier episodes of Law & Order. 

 

As the President of the Fairfax Coalition of Police Marshal Thielen said, “[w]hat she's done here is just horrible."  Amy Gardiner, Candidate Cries Foul Over Mailing, Washington Post, Oct. 27, 2007, at B05, available at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/26/AR2007102602063.html?nav=rss_metro.

 

More links to this controversy:

 

WUSA 9 report:  http://www.wusa9.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=64482

WUSA 9 video:  http://www.wusa9.com/video/player.aspx?aid=51550&bw=

AP report:  http://www.inrich.com/cva/ric/news/vaapwire.PrintView.-content-articles-AP-2007-10-27-0035.html  

DC Examiner report:  http://www.examiner.com/printa-1013294~Mail_piece_sets_off_debate_over_family's_privacy.html?cid=tool-print-top

 

***************************
2.  Jeannemarie Devolites Davis, blocking social security number privacy reform since 2002

***************************
It should not surprise anyone that Devolites Davis cares not for the Petersen’s family’s privacy – she cares not for anyone’s privacy.

 

Since at least 2002 Devolites Davis has been “studying” whether or how to protect the privacy of your social security numbers (“SSNs”) held in land records via her Joint Subcommittee studying the Operations of Circuit Court Clerks’ Offices.  Her study effort was essentially a front operation to stall the SSN privacy reform in Virginia – and stall she did through, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006; but in 2007, she introduced a bill to finally require SSNs to be redacted from land records prior to online publication by 2010.  Quietly however, despite the Governors signature on the bill, the bill did require ANY SSN redaction due to a “funding requirement” quietly inserted into the bill after it was introduced – and as there was no funding, there shall be no SSNs redaction even by by 2010, so the issue goes back to Devolites Davis’ study committee for more, well, you know, study.

 

Here is a timeline: 

 

2001-2002:  Devolites take control of the Joint Subcommittee studying the Operations of Circuit Court Clerks’ Offices.

 

On Feb. 1, 2003:  Then Delegate Devolites [not yet Davis] took the floor in the General Assembly to urge her fellow Delegates to oppose Delegate Sam Nixon’s (R-Chesterfield) HB 2426, a bill to require removal or redaction of SSNs from so called “land records” prior to their distribution by Court Clerks onto the Internet.  The term “land records” is quite broad, including deeds of trust, marriage and divorce papers, name change documents, and much more . . . pretty much everything but the kitchen sink. 

 

Devolites wanted the bill killed so that the issues could be “studied” by her Joint Subcommittee studying the Operations of Circuit Court Clerks’ Offices.  Said Devolites, “I am unaware of any clerk providing access to any records without a subscription.”  “Not true!” claims Hanover, VA based national privacy activist, Betty Ostergren, on her web based newspaper at http://www.opcva.com/watchdog/020303.html.  Ostergren had tapped into some Court Clerk’s sites at that time without subscrioption and downloaded SSN laden records. 

 

And in the final version of HB 2426, the bill was essentially gutted by merely requiring pay-per-view subscription such that anyone can sign up for online access to millions of SSN laden land records.  Devolites later was quoted in the Connection Newspaper as justifying her opposition to redaction of SSNs in land records by saying "I think this issue is turning out to be a money issue...at this time, when we're in a budget crisis, there are no additional dollars."  See http://www.fairfaxcountyprivacycouncil.org/Alert20033.html.htm. 

 

So as of the end of the 2003 General Assembly session, the issue was covered up in part by pay per view “secure” subscription slight of hand, buying time for Devolites to study the issue. 

 

2004:  Lot’s a’ studyin’.

 

2005:  More studyin’, with some late night pizza delivery.

 

2006:  Studies continue urgently thru the year.

 

Jan. 5, 2007:  Just in time for her Senatorial reelection, studies suddenly produce Devolites Davis’ SB 824 to require SSN redaction on land records by 2010.

 

Feb. 1, 2007:  Devolites Davis allows a committee substitute bill to be passed adding an enactment clause at the bottom such “[t]hat the provisions of subdivision B 1 of § 17.1-294 of the Code of Virginia of this act shall not become effective unless an appropriation of general funds effectuating the purposes of this act is included in a general appropriation act passed by the 2007 Session of the General Assembly, which becomes law.”

 

July 1, 2007:  Va. Code § 17.1-294 as amended by Devolites Davis bill becomes law, providing no deadline at all to the ongoing and massive publication of SSNs in “land records” through the internet – see  http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+17.1-294.  The fiscal impact statement at http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?071+oth+HB2062FER122+PDF states plainly:  “There is an enactment clause that eliminates the mandate for clerks to have redaction of records completed by July 1, 2010, if an appropriation of general funds to address the cost of redaction is not provided by the 2007 General Assembly.  Since the 2007 General Assembly did not provide general funds for this purpose, the July 1, 2010, effective date is eliminated.”

 

Ostergren, the Virginia Watchdog, has for years posted examples of public figures land records with SSNs on her web site at http://www.opcva.com/watchdog/RECORDS.html

 

In that link, you can find Devolites Davis’s SSN on a record at  http://www.opcva.com/watchdog/Devolites-Davis.pdf

***************************
3.  Bright spot of the week – Fairfax County Board of Supervisor Chairman candidate Gary Baise says “no” to
red light cameras

***************************
On Oct. 27, 2007 at the Fairfax County Taxpayers Alliance’s annual luncheon in Vienna, VA, Fairfax County Board of Supervisors candidate Gary Baise gave a brief talk and took some questions.  When asked directly if he would allow the County to use new the recently renewed state authority to wield red light surveillance cameras against the citizenry even though two VDOT studies have concluded such cameras lead to more injury producing accidents at intersection where cameras were installed.  Baise leaned forwarded and boomed into the microphone:  “The answer is no.”

 

***************************
4.  FCPC activist wins lawsuit against Norfolk Airport Authority over illegal sign at airport stating vehicles subject to search – who’s watching the airport board?

***************************

FCPC activist John Fenter, a retired navy man who lives in the Hampton Roads area of Virginia, prevailed in the Virginia Supreme Court to force the Norfolk Airport Authority to comply with the Virginia Freedom of Information Act and provide records relating to several signs posted at airport parking lots stating that all vehicles are subject to search.  Even the TSA turned against the ridiculously intransigent airport authority, shows court filings.  See opinion and order of the Virginia Supreme Court at http://www.courts.state.va.us/opinions/opnscvwp/1062563.pdf.

 

Such signs are not posted at reputable airports such as Reagan National and Dulles.  Just why did the Airport Authority fight this fight over a sign everybody knows is bogus anyway?  FCPC wonders who is watching the management of the Norfolk Airport Authority, which now owes John Fenter a big heap of money for his attorney fees and costs, as well presumably a bigger heap of fees and costs rung up by the Authority’s own outside lawyers and high priced consultants. 

 

Links to more news and analysis:

 

Marc Davis, Virginia Supreme Court rules Norfolk Airport Authority violated law, Virginian-Pilot, Sept. 15, 2007, at http://content.hamptonroads.com/story.cfm?story=132545&ran=172872.

 

Alan Cooper, Balancing security and FOIA, 24 Sept., 2007, at http://www.virginialaw.com/subscriber/archives_FTS.cfm?page=VA/07/9240738.htm.


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Questions, or to be added/deleted from future Alerts?  Contact Mike Stollenwerk at FCPCChairman@cox.net