========================================
FCPC ALERT #2006-2
www.FairfaxCountyPrivacyCouncil.org
Originally Published on 5 February 2006
========================================
This message is intended for members of the Fairfax County Privacy Council, and anyone else who might be interested in advancing privacy in Virginia. Maximum dissemination of this message is encouraged!

Privacy Notice: All communication from the Fairfax Privacy Council is sent using blind carbon copy ("BCC") format for your security and privacy.

ALERT ITEM SUMMARY:
1.  FFX BoS Chairman Connolly errs in attack on Sen. Devolites Davis' cell phone vote
2.  Take action against vehicle black box spy bills
3.  Judge rules
Richmond violated law in privacy related FOIA lawsuit
4.  Privacy Quote:  “…I should invite you to all the funerals.”

************************************
1.  FFX BoS Chairman Connolly errs in attack on Sen. Devolites Davis' cell phone vote

************************************
On the morning of 4 February 2006 before a packed town meeting at Mt. Vernon High School, Fairfax County Board of Supervisors Gerry Connolly (D) gave a speech generally criticizing the General Assembly meeting now in Richmond as failing to understand the needs of localities and specifically attacking Senator Jeannemarie Devolites Davis (R-Vienna) for voting against a teen “cell phone” ban bill patroned by Senator Jay O’Brien (R-Clifton).  Connolly claimed that Devolites Davis’ vote was “the deciding vote” to kill the “cell phone” ban bill because she said that the bill would lead to police “harassment of teens.”

Connolly’s speech was eloquent as usual, but factually incorrect.

For starters, Senator Devolites Davis voted with the majority of the Senate Transportation Committee to PASS Senator O’Brien’s SB137 to ban teen use of cell phones while driving, including making this a “primary offense,” allowing police to pull over any driver using as cell phone if the police officer has probable cause to believe that the driver might be a provision driver (a VA licensed driver under 18 years of age).  Even though the bill passed as a primary offense, Senator O’Brien told the committee that he expects to, at best, get the House of Delegates to pass the bill this year only if he agrees them to make teen cell phone use a secondary offense.  In other words, the “primary offense” aspect of the bill seems to be a bit of a bargaining chip in bi-cameral politics.

And while is true that Devolites Davis DID vote against SB533, a bill to both ban teen driver cell phone use AND make ALL current provisional license violations (i.e., driving after curfew or with too many young passengers) primary offenses, this vote did nothing at all to invalidate her previous vote **for SB137** to ban teen driver cell phone use as a primary offense.

Davis Devolites’ did not object to making teen driver offenses primary because it would lead to “police harassment.”  She simply noted that making ALL of the teen driver offenses primary would lead to widespread and unnecessary police detentions of young adults, like her daughter who will soon turn 18 yet will “look the same.”

Besides, SB533 was “dead on arrival" in the House of Delegates anyway.

Interestingly, over the past few months, Chairman Connolly “has denounced [Devolites Davis’ husband Representative Tom] Davis” (R-Fairfax County) for his opposition to DC Metro’s proposed sale of Metro land to encourage high density growth in Fairfax County (see “Metro Postpones Vienna Land Sale:  Rep. Davis Threatened To Withhold Funds Without More Input,” The Washington Post, by Lisa Rein, October 21, 2005; p. B01 at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/20/AR2005102002106.html).

TAKE ACTION:  Thank Senator Devolites Davis for voting against primary offense legislative overkill!

Suggested Message to district34@sov.state.va.us:

SUBJECT:  Thanks for holding the line against unnecessary primary offenses!

Dear Senator Devolites Davis:

Thank you for voting against SB533 to make all teen driver offenses “primary!”

Many or most young adults, including parents of young children, easily look like they might be under 18 years of age when they are driving a vehicle.  In some localities, political pressure on the police will cause widespread detention and unnecessary invasion of privacy of these adult drivers.

Secondary offenses are valuable because they send strong policy signals without wasting the time of police who have better things to do than pull people over for nanny state violations.

Please continue to oppose pollution of our motor vehicle code with unnecessary primary offenses.

Sincerely,

YOUR NAME
YOUR ADDRESS

************************************
2.  Take action against vehicle black box spy bills

************************************
In a rarely exercised parliamentary maneuver on Friday 3 February 2006, House Majority Leader William Howell (R-Fredericksburg) referred HB816 patroned by Delegate Joe May (R-Leesburg) to the House of Delegates Courts of Justice Committee for a closer look.

As some Delegates realized late last week, HB816 appears to be a “wolf in sheep’s clothing” because while it provides that vehicle black boxes (which record driver’s actions while driving) would be declared to be the property of the vehicle owner, the bill was riddled with exceptions that allow insurance companies an the police access to the box without any due process or court order!

There are more vehicle black box bills zooming about the General Assembly right now.  These bills seriously implicate the fundamental privacy rights of motorists and vehicle owners and the future of freedom to travel in America in the coming years.

TAKE ACTION:  Send a message to Chairmen of the General Assembly Courts of Justice Committees and leaderships of both houses to SLOW DOWN on the legalization of vehicle black box spying!

Suggested message to: DelDAlbo@house.state.va.us, district08@sov.state.va.us, DelBHowell@house.state.va.us, DelMGriffith@house.state.va.us, DelFHall@house.state.va.us, DelSLandes@house.state.va.us, DelBMoran@house.state.va.us, district28@sov.state.va.us, district12@sov.state.va.us, district35@sov.state.va.us, district31@sov.state.va.us

SUBJECT:  Slow down on legalization of vehicle black box spying!

Dear General Assembly Leadership and Chairmen of the House and Senate Courts of Justice Committees:

I have read that HB816 and other bills may soon legalize vehicular black box spying by insurance companies and the police without due process and court order.  This is unacceptable.

Please slow down and ensure that these bills get a thorough review by each house’s Courts of Justice Committee so that the bills can be corrected to ensure that insurance companies and the police cannot access vehicle black boxes without due process and court order.

Sincerely,

YOUR NAME
YOUR ADDRESS

************************************
3.  Judge rules Richmond violated law in privacy related FOIA lawsuit
************************************
FCPC Chairman Mike Stollenwerk won a lawsuit last week against Mayor Wilder and the City of Richmond for their refusal to respond to his September 2005 Freedom of Information Act request seeking documents related to an apparent conspiracy by the City of Richmond and a private corporation known as CityCelebrations.org to violate the Fourth Amendment rights of persons on public streets at the September 2005 "Second Street Festival" in Richmond.

Richmond Circuit Court Chief Judge Markow issued a ruling finding the City of Richmond in violation of the FOIA and ordered the City to pay Mike's legal expenses.  The court order can be found at http://www.vcdl.org/pdf/Court_Order_Stollenwerk_v_Wilder.pdf.

Ultimately the City of Richmond provided a very late and seemingly weak response at http://www.vcdl.org/pdf/RichmondFOIAJanuary06.pdf.

FCPC has gained at least one new member from Richmond who joined after seeing NBC12's coverage of the hearing, writing that something be done to stop all unlawful searches by CityCelebrations.org in Richmond when they hold events on public property because "I watched them [CityCelebrations.org] search ladies purses, diaper bags, even the canvas sleeves that people carry folding chairs in.  I watched them turn away people for possession of a camera."

************************************
4.  Privacy Quote:  “…I should invite you to all the funerals"
************************************
You’re dangerous.  I ought to invite you to all the funerals.” –Delegate Harry Purkey (R-Virginia Beach).

Source:  FCPC member Jim KadisonKadison claims that immediately after defeat of all 3 house photo-red light camera surveillance bills on Thursday, 2 February 2006, including Purkey’s HB109, a fuming Purkey sought Kadison out to make this comment to Kadison’s face.  Kadison, speaking as a representative of the National Motorists Association (http://www.motorists.org), had only moments earlier publicly testified against the Purkey’s bill claiming that studies show that photo-red light camera surveillance causes a net increase in accidents due to asymmetric driver responses at intersections armed with cameras.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Questions, or to be added/deleted from future Alerts?  Contact Mike Stollenwerk atFCPCChairman@cox.net.